Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Janet Klatt

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 01:08, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Janet Klatt

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Teacher only known for being accused of having sex with a 16-year-old pupil. Coverage of the case was minimal and only in local press:[1] Fails WP:BLP1E and Wikipedia:Notability (criminal acts). Fences&Windows 00:11, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. -- Fences&Windows 00:28, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. -- Fences&Windows 00:28, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete after setting aside her background info, this is a single event with minimal consequences, article doesnt explain why this is notable among other cases of this type. newsworthy, yes, but no sign that it stands out as unique, or in getting undue attention, or in starting some movement or series of other events.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 01:10, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails everything. Coverage is not significant. Location (talk) 03:06, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Ugh. Really? What's next, the reincarnation of the Brian Peppers article? No thank you. JBsupreme (talk) 07:53, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per WP:BLP1E. Joe Chill (talk) 19:37, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Individual and event does not pass WP:GNG or WP:N/CA as she has not “received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject.” Nom is correct is that coverage was only in local press. WP:BLP1E does not apply as the event itself is not notable. Therefore, discussion of article name does not need to be addressed. Nolamgm (talk) 23:39, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Weak coverage, event not peculiar, WP:BLP1E. --Cycl^opia - ^talk 00:11, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 06:23, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.